More brands than ever are investing and producing quality journalism to drive their earned media strategy. They recognize that it’s a valuable channel for simultaneously building authority while finding and connecting with customers where they consume news. But producing and distributing great content is no easy feat. At Stacker and our brand-partnership model Stacker Studio, our team has mastered how to create newsworthy, data-driven stories for our newswire. Since 2017, we’ve placed thousands of stories across the most authoritative news outlets in the country, including MSN, Newsweek, SFGate, and Chicago Tribune. Certain approaches have yielded a high hit rate (i.e., pick up), and one of our most successful tactics is helping add context to what’s going on in the world. (I mentioned this as a tactic in my Whiteboard Friday, How to Make Newsworthy Content: Part 2.) Contextualizing topics, statistics, and events serves as a core part of our content ideation process. Today, I’m going to share our strategy so you can create content that has real news value, and that can resonate with newsroom editors. Make a list of facts and insights You likely have a list of general topics relevant to your brand, but these subject areas are often too general as a launching point for productive brainstorming. Starting with “personal finance,” for example, leaves almost too much white space to truly explore and refine story ideas. Instead, it’s better to hone in on an upcoming event, data set, or particular news cycle. What is newsworthy and specifically happening that’s aligned with your general audience? At the time of writing this, Jack Dorsey recently stepped down as CEO of Twitter. That was breaking news and hardly something a brand would expect to cover. But take the event and try contextualizing it. In general, what’s the average tenure of founders before stepping down? What’s the difference in public market success for founder-led companies? In regard to Parag Agrawal stepping into the CEO role, what is the percentage of non-white CEOs in American companies? As you can see, when you contextualize, it unlocks promising avenues for creative storyboarding. Here are some questions to guide this process. Question 1: How does this compare to similar events/statistics? Comparison is one of the most effective ways to contextualize. It’s hard to know the true impact of a fact when it exists stand alone or in a vacuum. Let’s consider hurricane season as an example. There’s a ton of stories around current hurricane seasons, whether it’s highlighting the worst hurricanes of all time or getting a sense of a particular hurricane’s scope of destruction or impact on a community. But we decided to compare it another way. What if we asked readers to consider what hurricane seasons were like the year they were born? This approach prompts a personal experience for the readers to compare what hurricane seasons are like now compared to a more specific “then” — one that feels particularly relevant and relatable. I’ll talk more about time-based comparisons in the next section, but you can also compare: Across industries/topics (How much damage do hurricanes do compared to tidal waves?)Across geographic areas (Which part of the ocean is responsible for the most destructive hurricanes? Where has the most damage been done around the world?)Across demographics (Which generation is most frightened of hurricanes?)There are dozens of possibilities, so allow yourself to freely explore all potential angles. Question 2: What are the implications on a local level? In some cases, events or topics are discussed online without the details of how they’re impacting individual people or communities. We might know what something means for a general audience, but is there a deeper impact or implication that’s not being explored? One of the best ways to do this is through localization, which involves taking a national trend and evaluating how it’s reflected and/or impacts specific areas. Newspapers do this constantly, but brands can do it, too. For example, there are countless stories about climate change, but taking a localized approach can help make the phenomenon feel “closer to home.” We put together a piece that illustrated significant ways climate change has affected each state (increased flooding in Arkansas, the Colorado River drying up, sea levels rising off South Carolina, etc.). You could take this a step further and look at a particular city or community if you had supporting data or research. If you serve particular markets, it’s easy to implement this strategy. Orchard, for example, does a great job publishing real estate market trend reports in the areas they serve. But if you’re a national or international brand that doesn’t cater to specific regions, try using data sets that have information for all countries, states, cities, ZIP codes, etc., and present all of it, allowing readers to identify data points that matter to them. When readers can filter data or interact with your content, it allows them to have a more personalized reading experience. Question 3: What sides of the conversation have we not fully heard yet? The best way to tap into the missing pieces of a story is to consider how other topics/subject areas interact with that story. I’ll stick with our climate change theme. We did the story above on how climate change has impacted every state, which feels comprehensive about the topic, but there’s more to dive into. Outside of just thinking how climate change is impacting geographic areas, we asked ourselves: How is it affecting different industries? Now we have a look at a more specific angle that’s fascinating — how climate change has impacted the wine industry. When you have a topic and want to uncover less-explored angles, ask yourself a set of questions that’s similar to the compare/contrast model: How does this topic impact different regions? (E.g. What is wine’s cultural role in various countries?)How does this topic impact different demographics of people? (E.g. Who profits most from wine making?)How does this topic impact different industries? (E.g. How have wineries/vineyards impacted tourism?)How is this topic impacted by these various things? (E.g. How is the flavor of wine impacted by region? Who buys the most wine, and where do they live?)This should create a good brainstorming foundation to identify interesting hooks that aren’t often explored about a really common topic. Conclusion Not only will taking the approach of contextualizing differentiate your story from everything else out there, it will also allow you to re-promote it when a similar event occurs or the topic trends again in the future. Contextualized content is often this perfect blend of timeliness and evergreen that’s really difficult to achieve otherwise.
02.12.20235 Steps to Develop a Successful Instagram Marketing Strategy in 2022
02.12.2023Which Is A Better ETF Investment Right Now: ARKK or SARK?
We take a look at two ETFs that provide an alternative to one another, but should investors be long or short disruptive innovation?
Over the last few years, growth stocks have had stellar returns, with people rushing to buy businesses involved in industries such as electric vehicles, genomics, fintech, and more. While many such as Cathie Wood, believe in growth investing and the future potential in these industries, others believe that valuations have gotten lofty. After a turbulent start to 2022, should investors buy the ARK Innovation ETF (NYSEARCA: ARKK) or the Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF (NASDAQ: SARK)?
ARK Innovation ETF
The ARK Innovation ETF is ARK Invests flagship fund led by famed investor Cathie Wood. The fund revolves around companies making technologically enabled products and services that potentially change how the world works, and it calls this “disruptive innovation”.
The fund invests with a five-year time horizon and provides diversification across disruptive industries. It currently comprises 43 stocks, with Tesla the largest holding with a weighting of roughly 8%, followed by Teladoc, Zoom, Roku, and Coinbase.
Despite the recent downturn, the ETF has returned an impressive 236% over the last five years, more than double that of the S&P 500. An investment in ARK Innovation will require patience but can potentially produce outsized returns over the long term.
Many of its largest holdings are trading at high valuations and are unprofitable. Declines in larger holdings due to inflation fears, high-interest rates, and high valuations have weighed on the ETF’s performance and may continue to do so for some time.
Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF:
The Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF, SARK hereafter, was launched in November 2021. The ETF aims to achieve the inverse (-1X) of the return of the ARK Innovation ETF on a single day.
The SARK ETF provides an alternative for investors who believe that high growth stocks valuations have risen too high and that the bull thesis for these disruptive industries such as fintech and genomics, among others, seems stretched. Since inception, this has paid off with a 23% return versus a negative return for many major indices and the ARK Innovation ETF over the same time period.
Tuttle Capital CEO Matthew Tuttle stated that it focused on ARKK due to its holdings in “unprofitable, high-multiple technology”. This ETF may be a useful tool to hedge against declines in growth stocks and major indices, particularly in volatile times such as 2022, where the tech-heavy Nasdaq and S&P 500 have both entered correction territory.
The SARK ETF has an expense ratio of 0.75% due to it being an actively managed fund, but this also eats into returns.
It also has a limited operating history, and although it has been successful since its inception, this does not mean it will continue to do so. Inverse ETFs are typically only held for one day and can lead to losses quickly if, in this case, the Ark Innovation ETF rises.
So, which ETF is a better buy today?
Although the Tuttle Capital Short Innovation ETF can be used as a tool to provide short exposure, Cathie Wood’s ARK Innovation ETF appears to remain an excellent long-term investment for those with a high-risk appetite.
-
Contributing Writer at MyWallSt
-
Colm’s favorite stock is Virgin Galactic as it is representative of his visions for our world in the future.
Read More
What Is A Better Investment: Ark Invest or The S&P 500?
In a volatile market, should investors bet on America with the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF or Cathie Wood’s high-growth ARK Innovation ETF?
ARK Related Funds Set To Launch In European Markets
With ARK Invest’s ETFs struggling to even match the market, will new European access spell even more doom and gloom for the investment firm?
Cathie Wood to Unleash “Ark on Steroids” to the World
ARK Invest looks to test an extremely risky new strategy that could pay off massively for Cathie Wood if her predictions come to fruition